To quote Chad Junior;
This is the issue. Dragging more people through the turnstiles is what increases our income streams in the LONG TERM. Putting up the admission prices increases revenue in the short term, but the only that this is sustained is by a further increase the following year, and then the next year, and then the next year again. We need to be looking at the BIGGER PICTURE.
For example, early season last year we were averaging about 270 i beleieve? Maybe less. So;
06/07 - 270 x £8 (it’s only make beleive so we’ll go with the highest possible figure) = £2160
07/08 - 270 x £9 = 2430 so we’re up £270
Now we ended the season with a few gates of closer to 400, so that’s almost 150 fair-weather fans. If we can keep those coming, and build on it, then that would work out at;
370 x £8 = 2960 which is up £530 on a £9 admission fee with a lower attendance.
My concern isn’t about what i am paying to get in, i’ll be there every week, it’s about trying to entice more people down. That is what will increase turnover in both the short and long term.
Any marketing geezer worth his salt will tell you to see more of anything you either need to;
a) reduce costs to the consumer, or
b) offer a better product. Regardless of how good a team we will be next year, regardles of the football we will be playing, the product we are offering is still Unibond League football. And the best we can do is finish off 1 place higher in the league, so it’s not possible to say we’re gonna finish 10 places higher than last year.
My concern is attracting more people down to watch us, that’s all. On a seperate note, Vics are freezing their prices at £12. Therefore it’s only £3 more to watch Conference football next season. So if you are just a random football fan with a spare Saturday afternoon to kill, what’s to say you wont prefer to watch a higher level of football - more than likely featuring a professional side - for the added outlay of just £3?