SCUM

WHS – yes I do come on your forum a couple of times a week, to see what you are all up to!! But, I also read your letters in the local press.

You are quite correct Knutsfordian, if a consortium does take over the VS, the Vics will on paper, still be tenants but with a cast iron lease agreement. There is absolutely no way the club itself can secure the sort of funding needed to be able to purchase the ground, so it is left to others to try. But if all goes to plan (fingers crossed) and the right consortium takes over the ground, then hopefully they will invest in the club too. In turn, the Vics will benefit by being able to use the ground for functions/fundraising and will secure the bars/catering income. A luxury we didn’t have under the previous owner! This will all help to clear up the previous owner’s mess!

It’s a shame that both clubs are not doing better, both on and off the field, they seem to stumble from one problem to another. You’ll find WHS, that not all Vics supporters have wanted Witton to go to the wall, I certainly enjoy the rivalry too much with family and friends. But it seems a real shame that there are supporters out there, who will not entertain the idea of the clubs working together in some capacity. Done in the right way, it could be good for both and for the people of Mid Cheshire.

One comment you made in your last post which I am interested in WHS, is that “if Vics go under, it will help our cause”. Can I ask you how much you feel Witton will benefit if that happens? Do you think our core support (600-800) will suddenly start to attend games at Wincham Park? Do you think that all the local businesses would plough money into Witton? Many currently can’t/won’t support the two clubs, perhaps you think they’ll help one? Do you think that the Local Authority will really get involved? Not sure I can give you positive answers on each of them!

All the best and…up the greens! :woohoo:

To Northwicher. I have no real wish to see Vics go under except that it would help my club. Whilst you are right that your present support would not switch to us, young people with no allegiance at the moment would have no option but to come to us if they wanted to watch local semi-pro football. I also believe that our rivalry does stop some local investment, just look at the reacation when Mr. Connett looked like getting money off the local council. Some Wittoners were threatening their councillors with “death and destruction” if it went ahead. (well not voting for them at least). The same is true of local business, if they invest in one club the other club’s supporters tend to boycott them. So I do feel the one club idea is a good one, you want it to be Vics, I want it to be Witton.
WHS.

Just been looking at the Vics web site and I have to say it will be sad for many of their supporters if and when their team go “belly up” for they are similar to many of our supporters in their love for their club, just sad that their love is misplaced!!
WHS.

WHS wrote:

[quote]Just been looking at the Vics web site and I have to say it will be sad for many of their supporters if and when their team go “belly up” for they are similar to many of our supporters in their love for their club, just sad that their love is misplaced!!
WHS.[/quote]

I wouldn’t say our love is misplaced WHS. Our blood is green, we love the Vics whatever is happening, on and off the park! Yes we did get very angry over the way a certain person ran the Club upto last November and are certainly are not happy that person continues to cause many problems over the ground, but it hasn’t stopped many of us turning up every Saturday to support the lads. If you are a true supporter, it’s what you do!

We’re not out of the woods yet by any means, but you mention when we go ‘belly up’, have you got information that I don’t know about WHS?! It would be terrible for us if Northwich Vics ceased to exist, just as it would be for you, if Witton went down the same route. But I haven’t given up hope yet!

In an earlier post, you said that the one club idea is a good one, I want it to be Vics and you want it to be Witton. What’s your view on a merger (if of course the Clubs came into it equally, ie both with assets etc)? Does your head or your heart rule this issue?

PS good win for the Albion yesterday (not that I’m particularly pleased you understand) :stuck_out_tongue:

Let’s pack it in guys.
This debate is getting us nowhere and is getting tedious.

Merger is 100% out of the question in the short term future as vics have no assets. The only conceivable way I can ever see it happening is if vics get some assets and then one I buy the majority of shares in both clubs at a price that both clubs are happy with

I have no interest whatsoever in a merger for whatever reason.
WHS.

I think the idea that witton would not gain if vics dissappeared is nonesense. Northwicher claims that none of the 600 - 800 fans hard core would ever watch witton.

To start with 600 to 800 hard core is wishfull thinking, the other week there were 500 and that included away fans so hard core is about 400.

Witton hard core is about 200.

When vics doing well they get 600 to 800 maybe but witton doing well we get 400 to 500, so conclusion is there are 200-300 people that come when doing well, many of these maybe floaters.

No matter how hard core fans claim to be, if club dissappeared then they may start watching witton just to watch the opposition because for a lot of people it is about getting away from wife/family/lover/job/escape shopping trip/whatever they want an excuse to go out have a pie and a beer and watch footy, some may go crewe or whatever but many just want to go up the road for whatever reasons - they would start out supporting the opposotion but eventually come round when they realise what they been missing out on for all these years by watching vics gettting a spanking week in week out.

Anyway all this is poiintless argument coz they wont dissappear they will start again with the trust in a lower league trying to do a telford but it will never work coz not all the 400 hard core will turn up to watch them in the north west counties and they need 1500 a week to do a telford…….so vics demise would be to wittons advantage.

They may get rescued again this time or they may not but they will be in the same boat as they were before and they are just prolonging a slow painful death, better to put them out of their misery now.

WHS is right, Witton do not need a merger, Witton have assests and will get a huge sum of money for WP so we can build a new ground or pick up a ground on the cheap with cash in the bank - if vics long overdue final breathhappens at the same time then that is the icing on the cake, bingo! Even if no northwichers watch witton (some will) then witton no worse off and the next generation of fans will watch witton.

Many Vics fans have claimed, that if you cut them in half they bleed green.

I am no medical expert but I have to tell you, I have my doubts.

Maybe if some kind of device, (like the ones used during the French revolution), could be erected before one of our home games, then this outrageous claim could be disproved once and for all.

I, for one, am willing to bet my entire life savings that they bleed red.

Well, I can certainly confirm that.
I think some lower forms of life in animal kingdom do indeed have green blood but higher forms are red blooded.
May be some zoologist could shed light on it.:cheer: :cheer: :cheer:

WWWitton wrote:

[quote]Many Vics fans have claimed, that if you cut them in half they bleed green.

I am no medical expert but I have to tell you, I have my doubts.

Maybe if some kind of device, (like the ones used during the French revolution), could be erected before one of our home games, then this outrageous claim could be disproved once and for all.

I, for one, am willing to bet my entire life savings that they bleed red.[/quote]
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: nice one

vi8 wrote:

[quote]Let’s pack it in guys.
This debate is getting us nowhere and is getting tedious.[/quote]

Probably right vi8. I was interested in having a sensible debate with WHS about local football, as he has quite a few opinions on the subject. I also thought it was a chance for me to gain further information about my club, as it seems that many Wittoners are ‘in the know’, maybe I wanted to find out when my club were due to go ‘belly up’ etc!

WWWitton - I didn’t actually claim that none of the fans would ever stray across the canal and watch Witton! I know both clubs have ‘floating’ fans that really enjoy watching local football, so you probably would gain a few more coming through the gates. I just don’t think the numbers would be significant enough to make a real difference.

Anyway, I will get back to directing all my energies on supporting the senior club in the town. And whilst I admit that the Vics face a big battle in the future, to those Wittoners who are gloating and wish for us to go under, I will leave you with the old saying,
“people in glass houses…”

I have to say that Northwicher as done nothing but post calm, balanced and interesting posts. There is nothing wrong with having a sensible debate on a football forum…even with those from the darkside!

Northwicher is defending the club they support in the same manner that we support ours, I would much prefer to read the posts they have made than one of their supporters coming on and saying “your c**p, you’re going down. blah de blah”.

As a wittoner I dislike Vics as much as the next man but I am equally capable of putting myself in the shoes of one of their supporters. The last couple of years for them has been a very nervous time and whilst they always magically seem to survive it cannot have been a pleasant period as a supporter. Having Mr Connett as your chairman would be torture for anyone, I am just glad he was not on our side of the canal.

With the turmoil that we went through at the start of this season and our current league position we have had a good taste of what life may have been like as a Vics supporter! I don’t think anyone has room to gloat in the current local football climate.

As far as Vics are concerned. If they were to go ‘belly up’ then the benefit to us would be relatively minor in regards to attracting additional fans, it may also plough the town deeper into the footballing wilderness!

I would certainly not want a merger between the clubs, both have a long and proud history as two of the oldest non-league clubs and I think this should be protected. I hope that when I have kids they can grow up stood on the terrace watching Witton (poor things)!

I do subscribe to the view that a groundshare makes perfect commercial sense. One facility would be easier to maintain, potentially make more money and give both clubs arguably a better chance of survival. There is sentiment attached to where we play and plenty would prefer we were still based at the Central Ground. However Stoke used to play at the Victoria Ground, Arsenal at Highbury, indeed most of the clubs in the top flight have built new stadiums. Inter and AC share the San Siro and Dynamo and CSKA Moscow share the same ground, passionate cities where it is made to work.

The problems facing Vics remain grave in my opinion. They owe £300k to the tax man, they currently have a rent agreement of £50k a year. They wage budget is £35k a month plus £15k PAYE, which combined is over £10k a week. They are signing new players on a full time basis and including accommodation with the package which on paper they can ill afford.

Based upon the average gates of 850 (which includes some big away support) they cannot sustain that level of spending, the lowest league gates have been 300 lower than that!

The club does not own its ground and has the problem that the current ground is in the hands of the receiver with the owner also facing a winding up petition. If the receiver believes the best route to returning creditors their money is to bulldoze the stadium and sell the land then their lease may not be worth the paper it is written on, successor tenants or not!

For Northwich to seek a new consortium they are again relying on a single or group of benefactors, history shows the danger of this. If people plough £1m, £2m or £3m into a football club then they either want a return or at the very least they want control. What happens when the money is withdrawn, when these people get bored. It spells disaster and only adds to the rollercoaster ride! Speaking to Bradford Park Avenue fans on Saturday they have exactly the same concerns, their chairman currently picks the team according to them and he calls all the shots!

If Northwich were to go bust I would lose no sleep, I think some of their fans have a very strange view of reality and worry only about the money being available to buy players and challenge at the top of their league. When this happens people forget the consequences! I would however feel for the genuine Northwichers who deserve that fete just as much as we do!

We have our own set of problems to focus on. We have this year cut our budgets to a level that means we have one of the lowest playing budgets in the league and it is, as our league position shows, hard to compete on this basis. What our chairman has achieved is a degree of financial stability, however if our end product is poor and we are threatened with relegation our gates and our revenue will remain low. We need to have a medium and long term plan that brings more money, fans and commercial activity into the club. These days the off the pitch revenues need to support the playing budget to be in with a chance of competing.

Sure enjoy a smile over Northwich’s situation, but in their shoes how would you feel. Our shoes are not that different at the present time, just slightly more comfortable!

QUOTE

I do subscribe to the view that a groundshare makes perfect commercial sense. One facility would be easier to maintain, potentially make more money and give both clubs arguably a better chance of survival. There is sentiment attached to where we play and plenty would prefer we were still based at the Central Ground. However Stoke used to play at the Victoria Ground, Arsenal at Highbury, indeed most of the clubs in the top flight have built new stadiums. Inter and AC share the San Siro and Dynamo and CSKA Moscow share the same ground, passionate cities where it is made to work.

QUOTE

That is the nub of the issue as I see it. Two teams of independant means can share a ground, nearer to home Stockport County and Sale Sharks, Wigan FC and RL all manage to do so. The obvious benefit is sharing the costs of overheads.

To increase revenue from non-match days requires us to use the existing facilities better and possibly to develop new ones; specifically an all weather floodlit pitch available for hire to the entire community. Nantwich Town have done this, its behind the popular side terrace and gets used a lot. My nephews go each Saturday morning and have been to at least one first team fixture as a consequence. The Football foundation exists to help with such projects.

RS65 wrote:

[quote]
That is the nub of the issue as I see it. Two teams of independant means can share a ground, nearer to home Stockport County and Sale Sharks, Wigan FC and RL all manage to do so. The obvious benefit is sharing the costs of overheads.

To increase revenue from non-match days requires us to use the existing facilities better and possibly to develop new ones; specifically an all weather floodlit pitch available for hire to the entire community. Nantwich Town have done this, its behind the popular side terrace and gets used a lot. My nephews go each Saturday morning and have been to at least one first team fixture as a consequence. The Football foundation exists to help with such projects.[/quote]
Spot on RS, what is required is a facility that can be open 7 days and 7 nights that creates sports and leisure facilities for the whole of the community, from 5-a-side to indoor bowls (you may even get WHS there). If there are gym facilities, a bar, etc then the amount of money that can be generated from non-footballing activities will support the long-term developement of local football. Without such a facility then the opportunity to make revenue is limited.

I would have thought that a big leisure group like David Lloyd or Total Fitness could be approached to own and operate a good quality onsite gym (which as well as benefitting the community also helps the teams). An attractive stadium could appeal to a decent sponsor too.

If the Northwich Vision had the ‘vision’ then a development like this could be a very effective scheme. For a start the council could purchase our existing land for a fair market value and then control the development of good quality low cost housing which is one of the aims of the current schemes.

Hold on a minute, I’ve just seen a couple of pigs flying past my office window.

:wink:

Thank you Mr.Rabbit and Mr. RS65 for that.
As I said earlier the debate had gone long enough and it was about time it was laid to rest.

yes RIP vics.

amen to that.:stuck_out_tongue:

Dreams Rabbit, we are not even going to get a theatre never mind what you suggest. The “Vision” is virually all about housing with anything else just a tag on to sooth the masses. As for this thread, I agree it has served its purpose. I do understand that many Northwichers are nice enough, just misguided. I don’t know for certain that they will not be bailed out, what I do know is that money is tight and money spent on Football Clubs might as well be chucked down the drain, you very rarely ever see it again, and only true fans are happy to do that not hard headed businessmen.
WHS.

http://www.northwichguardian.co.uk/vics/3931704.Rushe__Tax_bill_is_under_control/

[quote]“We’ve not made as much inroads as I would like,” admitted Rushe.

“But when I came on board it was easier to borrow money and get funds into the club – that’s not the case now.

“The gates are lower than they were, which isn’t helping.”[/quote]

Oh deary deary…the excuses/justifications have started already!